send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
With de-industrialisation,Indian economy tended to become more and more agricultural. Millions of manufacturing classes in industrial towns like Dhaka ,Murshidabad, Surat and other places were rendered jobless and drifted from towns to villages for livelihood. This increasing dependence of the population on agriculture for subsistence and slant of the Indian economy on production of agricultural goods and raw material has been described as a trend towards ruralisation of Indian economy. British writers of 19th and 20th centuries took pride in describing India as traditionally an agricultural country.
A close examination of the British economic policy towards India makes it abundantly clear that Britain deliberately adopted such policies which ruined the competing handicraft industries of India, It then helped develop the agricultural resource of India to make it ”An agricultural Farm”of industrialsed Britain.As early as March 1769 The court of Directors desired the company’s agents in Bengal to encourage the manufacture of raw silk and discouraged manufactured silk fabric, this objective was to be achieved by forcing the silk winders to work in the company’s factories and prohibit them from working in their homes. A select committe of The House of Commons in 1783 desired a perfect plan of policy to change the whole face of India’s Industrial outlook. The Industrial revolution had brought about a change in the pattern of England’s economic development ,its expanding textile industries needed raw materials for its factories and market for the sale of her industrial products. These developments called for a change in method of British colonial exploitation in India. Now agriculture began to be influenced by commercial consideration. Certain specialised crops began to be grown not for consumption in the villages but for sale in national and international markets.
Industrialised Britain desired the development of the vast potential of India’s agriculture resources.The charter act of 1833 removed all restrictions on European immigration and acquisition of landed property in India and British capital flowed to develop India’s Plantation industry-In Tea ,coffee ,Indigo and jute cultivation. The Assam waste land rules provided for the grant of extensive tracts of land upto 3000 acre per holder as free hold property exempted from land tax on payment of fixed sum.The tea planters of Assam used force and fraud to recruit labour for work in tea estate. British government provided the legislative umbrella by legalising their exploitation. Act XIII of 1859 and inland immigration act of 1882 made breach of contract a criminal offence and authorised the tea planters to arrest a run away labourer without any warrant.
Alice and Daniel have rightly guessed that a major shift from industry to agriculture in India happened between 1815 and 1880. R.P.Dutt after a close examination of the census from 1891-1921,has calculated the increase in the percentage of the population dependent on agriculture thus: YEAR Percentage of population dependent on agriculture 1891 61.1% 1901 66.5% 1911 72.2% 1921 73.0%
The over pressure on agriculture created serious distortions in Indian economy.Apart from creating serious problems in the agrarian sector the increase in the number of persons in agriculture led to the fragmentation of land holdings,peasants did cultivation for livelihood not for surplus on the other hand high revenue demand from british forced the farmers to borrow money from money lenders ,now started a cycle of increasing poverty and indebtedness of rural economy in the 19th and first quarter of 20th century.
Access to prime resources