Explanation:

The five conditions in which whistle blowing is morally justified are:

1. A product or policy that will commit serious and considerable harm to the public.

2. When the employee identifies a serious threat of harm to the consumers, employees, other stakeholder, state and things against his or her moral concern.

3. Immediate supervisor does not act, should exhaust the internal procedures and chain of command to the board of directors. No action is taken in spite of best efforts of the employees to remedy the situation of unethical actions.

4. The employee must have documented evidence that is convincing to a reasonable level so that the facts can be proved to the outside public and to the test of the law.

5. Valid reasons to believe that revealing the wrongdoing to the public will result in the changes in the organisation are necessary to remedy the situation. The chance of succeeding must be equal to the risk and danger the employee takes to blow the whistle.

The whistle blower should take care that the action should not be simple mudslinging or raising alarm on inaccurate or unjustifiable grounds.