send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Two statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they
seem to beat variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All teachers are painters.
Some painters are rich.
Conclusions:
I. All painters are teachers.
II. Some rich are not painters.
Only conclusion II follows
Neither conclusion I nor II follows
Only conclusion I follows
Either conclusion I or II follows
From the question, Statements: All teachers are painters. Some painters are rich. Conclusions: I. All painters are teachers. II. Some rich are not painters. Conclusion I is not correct because, It is not compulsory that all painters are teacher, It may be or may not be. But all teachers are painter it is sure from the statement. Statement II does not assure that some rich are not painters, It may be or may not be So it is also not following. So option B is the correct answer.
Report error
Access to prime resources