send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
M and A were carrying on the business of commission agents as partners in a firm named MA. and Co. C, M’s son, was admitted to the benefits of the firm as he was a minor. The firm borrowed a sum of Rs. One Lakh from B, but was unable to repay. The firm was, thereupon, dissolved. Subsequently C became major and does not exercise the option not to become a partner. B applies to court and asks to declare all the three insolvent. C pleads minority. But the lawyers have advised C that he is liable up to his capital investment in the firm. Is it a sound advice? Give your advice on the subject. (10 marks)
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources