send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The real brothers Hukam Singh, Sukh Ram and Sukh Ram’s son Chhinda constituted a joint Hindu Family governed RIEM by the Banaras School of Mitashara Law under which a coparcener without obtaining the consent of the other coparceners was not competen to sell his undivided share for his own benefit. Hukam Singh died in the year 1952 and his widow Krishana Devi on 15-11-1956 sold Yz share in the family house and shop to Gauri Shankar, Sukh Ram and Chhinda filed a suit which was contested up to the Supreme Court of India. Discuss the following with reference to recent case law.
(i) Whether the sale deed is liable to be cancelled.
(ii) Whether the Hindu Widow’s right in property of Joint Hindu Family became larger than her deceased husband.
(iii) Whether the Hindu Widow, Krishana Devi continued to have limited interest.
(iv) Whether the Hindu Widow, Krishana Devi had already become absolute owner. (20 Marks)
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses