send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report for the Great Nicobar Infrastructure Project (GNIP) has drawn criticism for underestimating the earthquake and tsunami risks in the region—despite the area’s high seismic vulnerability, as seen during the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami.
Type
Description
Damage Potential
Body Waves
Travel through Earth's interior
Arrive first, cause less damage
→ P-Waves (Primary)
Compressional, travel through solids/liquids/gases
Least destructive
→ S-Waves (Secondary)
Transverse, travel only through solids
Moderate damage
Surface Waves
Travel along Earth’s surface
Slow but most destructive due to large amplitude
Zone
Risk Level
Approx. Area
Zone V
Very High
~11%
Zone IV
High
~18%
Zone III
Moderate
~30%
Zone II
Low
Remaining
The GNIP's seismic risk assessment must be revisited with scientific rigour, given the island's vulnerability. Ignoring lessons from 2004 could result in catastrophic environmental and human consequences. Long-term sustainability demands a precautionary approach combining development with disaster preparedness.
By: Shailesh Kumar Shukla ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses