send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Direction (): Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these. The 2008 financial crisis continues to adversely hurt millions of people in the United States. Few experts have contributed a significant body of research to design needed changes to the U.S. banking system for the sake of ordinary people. Together, they brainstormed what the necessary next steps should be to make banking safer for Main Street. One of the experts agrees with the U.S. Financial Inquiry Commission that the 2008 crisis was avoidable, since it was caused by weak corporate governance and policy failures. According to her, ten years after the crisis “the financial system remains fragile, inefficient and dangerous.” Her concern is that “Despite reforms put in place after the crisis, bankers, politicians and regulators consistently overstate the system’s health and the effectiveness of new rules.” The expert believes policymakers still lack “the political will to address the underlying flaws in the system.” These problems are due to the failure of markets to produce efficient outcomes when the interests of people with better information and control conflict with the broader public interest. She has focused in particular on trying to ensure that banks use more equity funding, a cause that has support from both sides of the political spectrum. She is concerned about recent Republican efforts to water over these particular rules for banks in the $100 billion to $250 billion asset range. “In principle, tailoring the rules sounds good, but the challenge is in the implementation. Tailoring is likely to lead to weakening of the rules in a race to the bottom.” She emphasizes that institutions with assets between $50 billion and $250 billion have been and can again be quite dangerous. The failure of one or more of them, or what will happen to many of them as a result of a change in economic conditions can cause significant disruption and collateral harm. The Savings and Loans crises along with others around the world have shown that even small institutions that all take similar risks and tend to fail at the same time can be dangerous and costly.
Which of the following best expresses the opposite meaning of the word “overstate” as used in the passage?
I. Magnify
II. Ambiguous
III. Downplay
Only I
Only II
Both II and III
Both I and III
Only III
"Overstate" means to exaggerate, magnify or amplify. "Downplay" means to understate or undervalue and carries an opposite meaning to "overstate". Ambiguous means unclear or undecided.
Report error
Please Wait..
Access to prime resources