send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements:
1. The authority competent to suspend the operation of “Fundamental Rights” guaranteed under the Constitution of India is the President.
2. Courts allow the predominance of Directive Principles over Fundamental Rights in context of all legislations.
Which of these statements is/are incorrect?
1 only
2 only
Both 1 & 2
Neither 1 nor 2
President is the deciding authority in such matters. But Article 20 and Article 21 cannot be suspended even during emergency.
Statement 2 is incorrect as Directive Principles predominate Fundamental rights only in case of social legislations involving Articles 39 (b) and 39(c)
Report error
Pritam Sharma
statement 2 is incorrect as the courts can allow the predominance of directive principles only in case of two directives under Artilce 39 b and c
Tarun Bilandi
as per explanation, correct answer is option 2
Noorbir Singh
Answer is ok sir
answer shall be 1st option
Please Wait..
Access to prime resources