Which one of the following statements about coins struck during 200 BCE to 300 CE nbs...........

Ancient and Medieval History Mauryan and Post Maurayan

Which one of the following statements about coins struck during 200 BCE to 300 CE in the Indian subcontinent is not correct?

This questions was previously asked in

CAPF 2022 Paper-1

The Inda-Greeks introduced bilingual and biscript legends on their coins.

The Kushanas minted large quantities of gold coins as well as copper coins of low denomination.

The Satavahanas issued coins of silver, copper, lead and potin.

Absence of Negama coins suggests the declining power and authority of merchant guilds.

Absence of Negama coins suggests the declining power and authority of merchant guilds.

The absence of Negama coins does not suggest the declining power and authority of the merchant guild.
Negama coins are a new type of Taxila guild currency.
The word negama means guild, and this coin was created by Taxila merchants for local trade in the Gandhara region.
A magnificent specimen with fine bull detailing and linguistic legends.
The front side of the coin was depicted with a Recumbent bull left, with Brahmi legend Negama above.
The back side of the coin was depicted with Lion's head facing, the monogram to left; Kharoshthi legend Negama above.

Submit Error