Explanation:

Sure! Let's break down the statement:

F ÷ U $ J $ V % H

Here’s what each symbol means:

- ÷ : is the father of

- $ : is the daughter of

- % : is the husband of

Let's decode one by one:

- F ÷ U ? F is the father of U.

- U $ J ? U is the daughter of J.

? So U is J’s daughter, and F is U's father, making F J's husband.

- J $ V ? J is the daughter of V.

? So J is V’s daughter.

- V % H ? V is the husband of H.

? So V (female, since she has a daughter J) is the husband of H. But by context, it would make more sense that H is the wife, and V is the male partner.

Building the family tree:

- H (wife), V (husband of H)

- J (daughter of V and H)

- U (daughter of J)

- F (father of U, so husband of J)

Now, how is F related to H?

- F is married to J, who is H's daughter.

Thus, F is H’s son-in-law.

Options explained:

- Father: F is not the father of H.

- Son: F is not the son of H.

- Nephew: Not related in this way.

- Son-in-law: Correct! F is married to H’s daughter J.

- Mother-in-law: Not correct.

Final Answer:

Option 4: Son-in-law

- F is the son-in-law of H, as he is husband of H’s daughter.

- The relationships are built step-by-step based on the given symbols.

- All options considered, only “son-in-law” fits the family tree.