send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Directions: In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II, and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.
Statement: The people who share the border of X and Y are generally involved in fights regarding the distribution of water, usage of national highways, and many more. The problem occurs when these fights hamper the other citizens as well. Due to this conflict, many a time they block the highways or destroy the national properties.
Courses of Action:
I: The local police station should immediately deploy policemen round the clock in the borders of X and Y.
II: The police need to identify the people involved in such fighting activities and put them behind bars.
III: All the transport facilities should be stopped between the two states.
Only II follows
Neither II nor III follows
None follows
All except III
All I, II and III follow
- Course of Action I: Deploying policemen can help maintain law and order and prevent fights. This is a plausible action.
- Course of Action II: Identifying troublemakers and enforcing legal consequences can deter further disturbances. This is a logical step.
- Course of Action III: Stopping all transport facilities may lead to economic disruptions and affect the daily life of the other citizens negatively. It's an extreme measure and might not be suitable.
- Option 1: Only Course of Action II follows. This misses the preventive aspect of policing.
- Option 2: Neither II nor III follows. This ignores the effectiveness of legal action.
- Option 3: None follows. This overlooks the possible solutions.
- Option 4: All except III. Courses I and II are good steps, but III is too harsh.
- Option 5: All I, II, and III follow. This includes a course of action that may cause more harm than good (III).
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses