send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In question, some statements are given, followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow from the given statements. Indicate your answer.
Statements :
All woods are chairs.
No chair is a table.
Some tables are copies.
Conclusions : I. Some woods are definitely tables. II. No table is a chair.
if only conclusion I follows
if only conclusion II follows
if both conclusion I and II follow
if neither conclusion I nor II follows
if either conclusion I or II follows
Analytical Method: All woods are chairs (A) + No chair is a table (E) = A + E = E = No wood is a table. Hence, conclusion I does not follow. Again, no chair is a table (E) → conversion → No table is a chair. Hence, conclusion II follows. Hence, option B is correct.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses