send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Direction (): Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these. That Americans don’t save enough money is a truism. But why don’t they? The answer is a complex mix of macroeconomics (incomes have stagnated for many workers over the last few decades), culture (Americans are notoriously conspicuous spenders), and policies (two-thirds of workers are at companies without retirement plans). But another ___________ is the challenge of giving up the gratification of immediate spending for the security of future savings. A new paper finds that two biases prop up many people’s disinclination to save: "present bias" and "exponentialgrowth bias." Present bias is a straightforward idea. People claim they’re willing to embrace all manners of self-control—saving money, working out, cleaning their room—provided that they don’t have to do so immediately. Academics use the terms such as “hyperbolic discounting” or “time-inconsistency” to designate this habit. The only distinction between saving next week and saving right now is the passage of time, and yet it makes all the difference in the attitude. Researchers in this study found the same attitudinal difference among their participants. When they asked people if they preferred $100 today, $120 in 12 months, or $144 in 24 months, they found that about half of respondents took less money if they could have it immediately. The second bias that the researchers consider, exponential growth bias, isn’t a cognitive bias, perhaps, so much as a failure of math. They found that 75 percent of participants in their study didn’t understand compound interest, the principle that even small annual growth over a long period of time yields surprisingly great returns. It’s intuitive to most young people that saving $100 now is better than saving $100 the year before they retire. But most people underrate the benefits of compounding interest. Saving $1 at the age of 20 is twice as valuable in retirement as saving $1 at the age of 40.
Rephrase the following segment from the passage to convey a similar idea: There is a “challenge of giving up the gratification of immediate spending for the security of future savings”.
The thought of saving for the future encourages most of the people to spend money as soon as possible.
Rather than opting for long term saving that would bear sweet results later, people tend to extract pleasure from the idea of spending their money as soon as possible.
Despite the temptation to spend their money immediately, people do save a significant amount for their future security.
Gaining immediate gratification is the key to save more as it is only after an individual spends all the money that he/ she realises the importance of saving.
None of these
"To give up the gratification of spending immediately" that people are tempted to spend as soon as they get money and do not bother about future security that could be done through savings. This idea is expressed in option B, which is the correct answer.
Report error
Access to prime resources