send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Option 1 is incorrect because while a fixed levy per tonne of CO2 was proposed by the International Chamber of Shipping, it was not adopted.
Option 2 is incorrect since China proposed a market-driven approach with compliance unit trading, but it was not adopted.
Option 3 is correct as the IMO adopted Singapore's hybrid model, influenced by India's proposal, including a GHG Fuel Standard and a tiered system.
Option 4 is incorrect because the fixed GHG levy was the European Union’s proposal and not adopted by IMO.
By: susheel ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses