send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Context: COP29 in Baku approved standards for establishing an international carbon market, emphasizing its potential to reduce global emissions.
Carbon markets enable trading carbon credits to internalize environmental costs and curb pollution.
However, challenges like governmental manipulation and corporate misuse persist.
COP29, held in Baku, Azerbaijan, has approved standards to establish an international carbon market, potentially operational by next year.
This step highlights the role of carbon markets in curbing carbon emissions and addressing climate change challenges.
A carbon market allows buying and selling of rights to emit carbon dioxide.
Governments issue carbon credits, each equivalent to 1,000 kilograms of carbon dioxide, to limit emissions.
Entities without carbon credits are prohibited from emitting carbon.
The market price for carbon credits is determined by supply and demand dynamics.
Carbon offsets involve businesses purchasing credits from environmental organizations that commit to carbon reduction activities like tree planting.
Carbon markets address the problem of externalities, where the environmental cost of economic activities is not internalized in market prices.
They impose financial costs on firms for carbon emissions, encouraging them to reduce pollution.
Standardized accounting frameworks and technological advancements have enhanced corporations’ ability to monitor emissions and report accurately.
Voluntary reporting systems like the Carbon Disclosure Project are preferred by corporations, while they oppose government interventions.
Firms advocate free trading of carbon credits, which they claim ensures efficient allocation of resources.
Governments may manipulate the supply of carbon credits, either oversupplying them to reduce prices or allowing firms to bypass regulations.
Firms purchasing carbon offsets may engage in virtue signaling, with limited actual impact on reducing emissions.
Critics question governments’ ability to determine the optimal supply of carbon credits, as political interests may lead to restrictive or overly lenient policies.
Restrictive policies may hinder economic growth, while lax regulations may fail to achieve meaningful emission reductions.
The effectiveness of carbon markets depends on transparent governance, strict enforcement, and incentivized participation by firms and governments.
Ensuring accountability in carbon offset mechanisms and maintaining optimal credit supply are critical for achieving environmental goals.
Collaboration between governments, corporations, and international bodies is essential to balance economic growth and climate commitments.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses