send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Context: Recently, Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud emphasized the significance of cooperative federalism, highlighting the GST as a prime example.
The Founding Fathers of India established a “Union Constitution” that reflects a federal structure with a strong central government.
Federalism in India involves a sharing of power between the central and state governments, where both levels are empowered and co-equal.
Dr. Ambedkar emphasized that India’s Constitution defines it as a Union of States, not a loose collection of independent entities.
Cooperative federalism involves the Centre and states working together towards development while acknowledging the importance of both collaborative discussions and “interstitial contestation” between the two levels of government.
Key institutions like the NITI Aayog, Finance Commission, and GST-Council play crucial roles in policy making and modern federalism in India, underpinned by principles of equity, capacity, stability, and growth.
The 101st Amendment, introducing the Goods and Services Tax (GST), marked a significant advancement in cooperative federalism by enabling both the Centre and States to levy taxes on goods and services concurrently, thus maintaining the federal structure.
This cooperative approach involved the Centre relinquishing exclusive tax powers on manufacturing, while States gave up exclusive sales tax powers, facilitating uniformity in indirect taxation.
The collaborative effort led to harmonized GST laws, common definitions, procedures, and compliance mechanisms across the country, effectively reducing compartmentalization in taxation.
Cooperative federalism aspect of GST ensures equal representation of states in decision-making processes, with most GST Council decisions reached by consensus.
GST significantly contributes to state revenues, with states receiving 100% of the State GST (SGST) collected and approximately 50% of the Integrated GST (IGST).
Over time, tensions have emerged, particularly regarding GST compensation and the Council’s decision-making process.
States began to express concerns about delayed compensation, especially during the economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to accusations against the Centre for insufficient support.
Opposition-ruled states perceive the GST Council as dominated by the Centre, which holds one-third of the voting power.
Healthy federalism requires negotiation and consensus, especially in a diverse country like India.
GST intends to transform India into a true economic union, with the aim of ‘One Nation, One Tax, One Market’.
The GST reform’s success depends on open dialogue and collaborative decision-making.
The Centre must foster a consultative approach to strengthen fiscal federalism and address emerging conflicts.
Federalism should be assessed not only on legislative powers but also on its ability to uphold democratic ideals of equality, liberty, dignity, and fraternity.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses