send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Context: The article discusses the challenges of global climate cooperation, focusing on the disparity between developed and developing nations like India.
The article also highlights demand and supply-side measures for sustainability.
The 2024 U.S. presidential election is likely to have a greater impact on global climate efforts than COP-29 itself.
National interests may hinder global climate cooperation, especially when developed countries, like the U.S., have fewer incentives to change course compared to developing nations such as India.
India’s commitment to net-zero emissions by 2070 highlights the disparity in climate action responsibilities between developed and developing nations.
Scientific consensus stresses that to avoid devastating climate impacts, global temperatures must stay within 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.
The U.N. IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report estimates that the remaining global carbon budget to limit temperature rise to 1.5°C is 400-500 billion tonnes of CO2, with annual emissions around 40 GtCO2.
Drastic reductions in emissions are necessary, but achieving net-zero globally is complex and requires sharp declines in total emissions.
Developed countries, responsible for most historical emissions, are expected to lead the transition to net-zero by 2050.
Developing countries like India are given more time to balance development with climate action.
Developed countries have failed to meet climate financing expectations.
Small island nations are disproportionately affected by climate change.
India’s per-capita emissions are among the lowest in the world.
The wealthiest 10% in India contribute 20 times more emissions than the poorest 10%.
Climate change disproportionately affects the poor in India.
India’s large size and diversity mean some regions are more polluting than others, and the country lacks the resources to support developed-world lifestyle standards for its entire population.
Unsustainable lifestyle aspirations could exacerbate issues such as food shortages, groundwater depletion, and biodiversity loss by the 2040s.
Unchecked consumption could lead to a massive increase in power demand by 2070, requiring 5,500 GW of solar and 1,500 GW of wind.
Current renewable energy capacities are 70 GW for solar and 47 GW for wind, far below the required levels.
Achieving renewable energy targets may conflict with the need for land to support food security and biodiversity.
A balanced long-term strategy should focus on “sufficiency consumption corridors,” limiting unsustainable growth while meeting development goals.
Demand-side measures include energy-efficient construction, transport, and mindful consumption choices.
On the supply side, India should decentralise energy production, expand nuclear power capacity, and focus on renewable energy integration.
As global climate targets become increasingly urgent, India must act decisively to ensure a sustainable future, despite external challenges like U.S. leadership and global climate finance gaps.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses