send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Context: Uttarakhand has not just become the first Indian state to launch a Gross Environment Product Index, but also the first in the world to go beyond ecosystem services to ecosystem growth.
GEPI is a novel method to evaluate ecological development caused by human interventions.
This innovative metric aims to quantify the ecological wealth of a region by assessing both the benefits derived from the environment and the contributions made to enhance it.
Unlike traditional environmental metrics that focus solely on ecosystem services, GEP includes the idea of ecosystem growth, making it the first such index globally.
This approach could potentially redefine how we measure and value environmental health in relation to economic growth.
The air component of GEP assesses air quality and the impact of human activities on atmospheric health.
It considers both pollution levels and efforts to reduce emissions or enhance air purification through natural or engineered processes.
Soil health is a critical indicator in the GEP Index.
It measures the quality of soil, considering factors such as fertility, contamination levels, and soil conservation practices.
The aim is to ensure that the soil remains productive and capable of supporting agriculture and natural vegetation.
The forest component of GEP goes beyond simply counting the number of trees.
It evaluates the types of trees planted, their survival rates, and their ecological value.
For instance, broad-leafed trees, which are more beneficial for the environment, receive greater weightage in the index compared to less preferred species like pine.
This approach encourages the planting of more ecologically valuable trees and ensures sustainable forest management practices.
The water component examines both natural and human-made water bodies, assessing their quantity and quality.
It includes the evaluation of water conservation efforts, such as the creation of man-made reservoirs like Amrit Sarovars, and compares them with natural water sources like rain-fed lakes and rivers.
The index aims to reflect the overall water availability and the effectiveness of conservation initiatives.
GEP index = (Air- GEP index + Water- GEP index + Soil-GEP index + Forest-GEP index.
Help assess the impact of anthropological pressure on our ecosystem and natural resources.
Also Calculates what we put back into the environment.
Quantifies contributions of natural ecosystems to the economy and overall welfare.
It provides a robust and integrated method for assessing a state's ecological growth, capturing various facets of environmental well-being as a result of human actions.
Despite its innovative approach, the GEP Index has faced some criticism.
It is argued that the index oversimplifies complex environmental issues.
It is suggested that activities impacting the environment should be categorized into those that should be prohibited, regulated, or promoted.
There is a need for stringent environmental impact assessments and cautions against using human interventions to justify environmental degradation.
There is also concern about the scientific rigor behind the GEP formula.
Some experts have questioned the clarity and transparency of the methodology used to develop the index.
It is pointed out that the values presented in the media are not well understood, and there is uncertainty about how GEP would be implemented at a national level.
Despite the criticisms, the GEP Index has garnered support from key stakeholders, including the Uttarakhand government.
The index has the potential to offer a meaningful alternative by quantifying the contributions of natural ecosystems to the economy and human well-being.
By translating these diverse contributions into a single monetary value, GEP reflects the true worth of natural capital.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses