send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
With reference to Rule 267 of the Rajya Sabha, consider the following statements:
1. It gives special power to a Rajya Sabha member to suspend the pre-decided agenda of the house.
2. This rule was invoked for the first time in the Rajya Sabha in 2016 for allowing a debate on demonetization.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Rule 267 of the Rajya Sabha:
Rule 267 of the Rajya Sabha rulebook has become a bone of contention in the Upper House as not a single notice under the rule moved by the Opposition has been accepted in the Winter Session.
Rule 267 - Rule 267 of the Rajya Sabha rulebook gives special power to a Rajya Sabha member to suspend the pre-decided agenda of the House, with the approval of the Chairman. Hence, statement 1 is correct. o Significance - No other form of discussion entails suspension of other business.
If an issue is admitted under Rule 267, it signifies it’s the most important national issue of the day.
Also, the government will have to respond to the matter by replying during the discussions under Rule 267. o Exception - The rule will not apply where specific provisions already exist for suspension of a rule under a particular chapter of the Rules.
In History - Parliamentary records said that there were 11 instances between 1990 till 2016 that this rule was invoked for various discussions.
The last instance was in 2016 when then Chairman Hamid Ansari allowed for a debate on the “demonetization of currency”. Hence, statement 2 is not correct.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses