send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Context: Recently, the Supreme Court modified its June 3, 2022 order mandating a one-kilometre eco-sensitive zone (ESZ) around protected areas, saying if such a direction is continued, rather than avoiding man-animal conflict, this will intensify it.
2022 order will not be applicable to ESZs.
The 2022 order stated that the National Park and wildlife sanctuary must have an ESZ of minimum 1km, measured from the demarcated boundary of such protected forest.
It lifted a complete ban on development and construction activities within eco-sensitive zone (ESZs).
Rule 5 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 lays down procedure for notifying an ESZ and prohibiting or restricting various activities in the specified areas.
It will also not be applicable where the national parks and sanctuaries are located on inter-state borders or share common boundaries.
Any development activity in a notified ESZ, and national parks or sanctuaries for which no ESZ has been notified, will require consideration and recommendation of the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) or its standing committee in addition to the environment clearance under the EP rules.
No mining would be allowed, either within national parks and sanctuaries or in a 1-km radius.
The rights of the villagers residing in the Protected Areas are required to be settled in accordance with the provisions contained in the Wildlife Protection Act 1972
Such villagers have to be rehabilitated outside the Protected Areas.
However, no such settlement of rights is available to the villagers residing in the ESZs areas.
Even for continuation of existing activities, the permission of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF) of each State or Union Territory would be necessary.
The Nagarjunasagar Srisailam Tiger Reserve- Andhra Pradesh
The Valmiki Wildlife Sanctuary, Valmiki National Park and Valmiki Tiger Reserve- Bihar
The Mangalavanam Bird Sanctuary- Kerala
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses