send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Context: Around 68% corruption complaints against public functionaries that landed with the Lokpal of India were “disposed off” without any action in the past four years, according to information provided by the parliamentary panel report.
On January 5 2023, the Lokpal of India has issued an order that complaints received by the office of the Lokpal of India that were not in the prescribed form would not be entertained at any level.
The Lokpal of India, the country’s first anti-corruption body instituted four years ago to investigate complaints against public functionaries, including the Prime Minister, submitted to a parliamentary panel that it has not prosecuted even a single person accused of graft till date.
Complaints against public functionaries: Around 68% of corruption complaints against public functionaries that landed with the Lokpal of India were “disposed off” without any action in the past four years. Only three complaints were fully investigated.
The anti-corruption body received 8,703 complaints, out of which 5,981 complaints were disposed of.
As many as 6,775 complaints were rejected for not being in the correct format.
The office informed that only three complaints were fully investigated, and 36 complaints were at a preliminary stage.
In 2022-23, as many as 2,760 complaints were received, out of which only 242 were in the prescribed format.
A large number of complaints were being disposed of on the ground that the complaint is not in the prescribed format.
Not prosecuted a single person: Lokpal has not prosecuted a single person accused of the graft to date and its performance seems to be far from satisfactory.
Vacant posts: The post of the chairperson of Lokpal has been vacant since May 2022. The panel has sought the government’s response on the action being taken to fill up the vacancies.
Nearly 90% complaints were not in the prescribed format.
The parliamentary panel report was based on information of the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), since 2019-20.
The term "Lokpal" was coined by L.M.Singhvi in 1963.
The concept of a constitutional ombudsman was first proposed in parliament by Law Minister Ashoke Kumar Sen in the early 1960s.
The first Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) recommended the enacting of the Office of a Lokpal.
Forty five years after its first introduction and after ten failed attempts, the Lokpal Bill was finally enacted in India on 18 December 2013.
The Act was passed in 2013.
The country’s first Lokpal, Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghosh, was appointed on March 19, 2019 along with eight other members.
Justice Ghosh moved out of office in May 2022 after attaining 70 years of age and since then, Pradip Kumar Mohanty has been acting as the Chairperson of Lokpal.
A search committee will prepare a panel of candidates, a selection committee will recommend names from among this panel, and the President will appoint these as members.
The Lokpal should consist of a chairperson and such number of members, not exceeding eight.
The selection process of other members is same as that of chairperson.
Of this 50% should be judicial members. At least 50% should be from SCs, STs, OBCs, Women or minorities.
Salaries, allowances and service conditions of the Lokpal chairperson will be the same as those for the Chief Justice of India; those for other members will be the same as those for a judge of the Supreme Court.
Lokpal was established in an effort to promote clean and responsive governance. Therefore, the Lokpal should act as an enabler rather than an inhibitor.
The panel recommends Lokpal not to reject genuine complaints merely on the technical ground that the complaint is not in the prescribed format.
At a time when India is heading the G20 Anti Corruption Working group, Lokpal should rise to the occasion and make every effort to strengthen the anti-corruption landscape in the country.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses