send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Context: The Supreme Court has dismissed appeals against a tribunal order, reinforcing the National Financial Reporting Authority's (NFRA) jurisdiction, even for audits predating its creation in 2018. This development has significant implications for the oversight of corporate and financial sectors in India.
The National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) was established on October 1, 2018, according to a Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA)
The rules governing NFRA were notified on November 13, 2018. However, the audits (in question) examined by NFRA were conducted for the financial year 2017-18, and the audit reports were issued before NFRA's establishment.
This led to the argument that NFRA lacked jurisdiction to retrospectively review these audits.
Legal Doctrine: The "doctrine of merger" establishes that when a higher court issues a decision on a case, the lower court's ruling becomes absorbed into it. This principle maintains legal hierarchy and prevents conflicting judgments.
NFRA's Jurisdiction: The NFRA's retrospective jurisdiction was affirmed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in December 2023. The tribunal upheld the NFRA's authority over alleged audit lapses, even for audits conducted before its establishment.
The Supreme Court's refusal to intervene in the NCLAT's decision solidifies NFRA's authority, including its retrospective jurisdiction.
The clarity on NFRA's retrospective powers ensures continuity in oversight of statutory audits, avoiding regulatory gaps.
The Supreme Court's endorsement of the NCLAT's decision establishes NFRA's authority in setting financial reporting standards and norms.
The National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) was established under Section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013, effective from October 1, 2018.
To create an independent regulatory body responsible for accounting and auditing regulations.
To enhance trust among investors and the public in a company's financial reporting.
The government's objective in creating NFRA is to:
Ensure a separate and impartial regulatory body for overseeing accounting and auditing laws.
Restore confidence in financial reporting following recent corporate scandals.
Retrospective jurisdiction refers to the authority of a regulatory body or legal entity to investigate and take action on events or matters that occurred before its establishment or before certain laws or regulations were enacted.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses