send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A deadlock between Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha calls for a joint sitting of Parliament during the passage of:
Ordinary legislation
Money Bill
Constitutional Amendment Bill
Non of the above
- Option 1: Ordinary legislation
- When there's a disagreement between the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha over an ordinary bill, a joint sitting can be convened to resolve the deadlock.
- This mechanism allows both houses to debate and vote together.
- Correct Answer
- Option 2: Money Bill
- Money Bills can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha.
- The Rajya Sabha can suggest amendments, but the Lok Sabha is not obligated to accept them.
- No joint sitting is required for Money Bills.
- Option 3: Constitutional Amendment Bill
- These bills require a special majority in both houses separately.
- There is no provision for a joint sitting.
- Option 4: None of the above
- Incorrect, as ordinary legislation does call for a joint sitting.
The answer is option 1, as only ordinary legislation can be settled via a joint sitting if a deadlock occurs.
Report error
Please Wait..
Access to prime resources