send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Statements:
All monkeys are parrots.
No parrot is crow.
Some crows are horses.
All horses are tigers.
Conclusions:
I. Some tigers are parrots.
II. Some crows are monkeys.
III. No tiger is parrot.
IV. Some horses are parrots.
Only II follows
Only I follows
Only III follows
either I or III follows
Report error
Mehul Sethi
The explanation does not matches with the answer
Atul abhishek toppo
Kindly check the question again
Question as well as solution is correct. there is no direct relation between parrot and tiger .So there is possibility that some tiger can be parrot . also the possibility is no tiger is parrot. so answer is either I or III follows.
Rohit Gupta
How some tigers can be parrots?
Rashi gupta
the explanation clearly shows that 1 doesnot folows
Access to prime resources