send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements about Local Self Government under British India:
1. The Government of India Act,1919 empowered the Central Legislature to develop the local self-institutions according to the provincial needs and requirements.
2. The Simon commission suggested financial decentralization to the local self-government.
3. The Charter Act of 1793 gives municipal institutions a statutory basis.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
2 only
3 only
1 and 2 only
1 only
The Charter Act of 1793, also known as the East India Company Act 1793 was passed in the British Parliament in which the company charter was renewed. The Charter Act of 1793 put the municipal institutions on a statutory basis. Hence statement 3 is correct. ? The Governor-General was empowered to appoint Justices of Peace in the presidency towns. These Justices of Peace were given powers to levy taxes on houses arid lands to meet the cost of police, scavenging, and repair of roads. ? A house tax at the rate of 5% of the rental value was imposed in the presidency towns. Between 1840 and 1853 the rate-payers were given the right to elect members of corporations, but the process was reversed in 1856 when all executive power, in the Bombay town, was concentrated in the hands of a nominated commissioner. A similar procedure was followed in Madras and Calcutta. Further attempts to introduce the elective element were made in 1872, 1876, and 1878. ? With the coming into force of the Government of India Act 1919 local self-government became a 'transferred' subject under popular ministerial control. ? The Government of India no longer issued any instruction to provincial governments and each province was allowed to develop local self-institutions according to provincial needs and requirements. Hence statement 1 is not correct. ? Under the Scheduled Taxes Rules, the taxes which could be imposed by local bodies were separated from those which fell within the competence of provincial governments. The Indian ministers, however, could not do much work in the sphere of local self-government for lack of funds, since finance was a 'reserved' subject under the charge of an Executive Councillor. ? The Simon Commission reporting in May 1930 referred to the wide financial powers exercised by local bodies. It, however, observed that village panchayats had not shown any marked progress except in the U.P. Bengal and Madras. The Commission suggested the retrograde step of increasing the control of provincial governments over local bodies in the interest of greater efficiency and quoted the example of England where “numerous administrative devices, by inspection, by audit, by the giving of grants-in-aid on conditions ensuring efficiency. Hence statement 2 is not correct.
Report error
Access to prime resources