send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Who adopted the title of ‘kings of king’ :
Kushans
Shakas
Pratiharas
Mauryas
- Kushans:
- The Kushans adopted the title "King of Kings," or "Shahanshah," which indicates a ruling king over other subordinate kings. This title was commonly used in Central Asia and parts of India under their rule.
- Shakas:
- Although the Shakas were known for their invasions and rule in parts of India, there is no strong historical evidence that they used the title "King of Kings." They were one of the groups of Indo-Scythians.
- Pratiharas:
- The Pratiharas were one of the prominent dynasties during early medieval India, but they did not use the title "King of Kings." They are known more for their influence in the Gurjara-Pratihara Empire.
- Mauryas:
- The Mauryas, being one of the largest and most powerful ancient Indian empires, did not typically use the title "King of Kings." They are known for having rulers like Ashoka, who adopted other titles and principles like "Devanampriya" (Beloved of the Gods).
Report error
Access to prime resources