send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of the following features of the Indian Parliamentary model differentiates it from the Westminster Model?
1. Prime Minister can be from either house of the Parliament
2. Supremacy of the Parliament
3. No legal responsibility of the ministers
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
1 and 2 only
1 and 3 only
2 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
Indian parliamentary Model versus Westminster Model: ? Indian Prime Minister can be a member of either house of the Parliament whereas British Prime Minister must be a member of the Lower House of British Parliament. (Hence statement 1 is correct)
? Indian Parliament is not a supreme body like British parliament. In India, Constitution is supreme. Sovereignty of Indian Parliament is limited by- Written nature of Indian Constitution, Federal system of Government, System of Judicial Review, and Fundamental rights. (Hence statement 2 is incorrect) ? In Britain, every order of the king for any public act is countersigned by a minister. If the order is in violation of any law, the minister would be responsible and would be liable in the court. In India, on the other hand, there is no provision in the Constitution for the system of legal responsibility of a minister. It is not required that an order of the President for any public act should be countersigned by a minister. (Hence statement 3 is correct)
Report error
Please Wait..
Access to prime resources