send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements with respect to ‘basic structure’ and choose the correct statements.
1. In the Kesavanandha Bharati case the Supreme Court ruled that the Constituent power of the Parliament under Article 368 does not enable it to alter the ‘basic structure’ of the constitution.
2. However the Supreme Court in its review changed its earlier stand with respect to ‘basis structure’ and ruled that if the public opinion is against basis structure it can be altered.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
The content of the Kesavananda Bharathi case is that the constituent power of the Parliament under Article 368 does not enable it to alter the basis structure of the constitution. Since power to amend the Constitution is not unlimited, if changes brought about by amendments destroy the identity of the Constitution, such amendments would be void.
Whether the basic structure test can be applied to ordinary laws or restricted only to constitutional amendments. In Kuldip Nayar v Union of India, the Supreme Court held that the doctrine should be strictly limited to constitutional amendments. The Centre took the stand that the doctrine is inapplicable to ordinary statutes.
Report error
Access to prime resources