send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
With reference to the Indian polity, consider the following statements:
An Ordinance can amend any Central Act.
An Ordinance can abridge a Fundamental Right.
An Ordinance can come into effect from a back date.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
I and II only
II and III only
I and III only
I, II and III
- Statement I
- Correct. An Ordinance issued by the President (or Governor for states) can amend any Central Act, similar to how a regular legislative act would.
- Statement II
- Incorrect. While theoretically possible, abridging a Fundamental Right through an Ordinance is controversial and would be subject to judicial review, similar to any legislative action affecting Fundamental Rights.
- Statement III
- Correct. An Ordinance can come into effect from a backdate, allowing retroactive application, just like regular legislation.
- Correct Answer: Option 3, I and III only
By: Rajinder Chaudhary ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses