send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
All wood is Fire
Only few air is water
Some Fire is air
Conclusions:
I. All wood can be water
II. Some water is Fire
Only I follow
Only II follow
Either I or II follows
Neither I nor II follows
Both I and II follows
- The statements provided are as follows:
- All wood is fire.
- Only a few air is water.
- Some fire is air.
- For Conclusion I: "All wood can be water"
- Given that all wood is fire, and because there is no direct restriction between wood and water, this statement can logically be true, but not definite.
- For Conclusion II: "Some water is fire"
- Since there's no definite link that says any of the water must be fire, this is uncertain with the given information.
- Evaluating options:
- Option 1 (Only I follow): This suggests conclusion I logically follows.
- Option 2 (Only II follow): This indicates only conclusion II logically follows.
- Option 3 (Either I or II follows): Means if one concludes, the other cannot and vice-versa.
- Option 4 (Neither I nor II follows): Implies neither conclusion logically follows.
- Option 5 (Both I and II follows): Suggests both conclusions logically follow.
- Option 1: Only I follows is correct because the possibility of all wood being water isn't contradicted by the given statements.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses