send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Passage:
The history of science is the real history of mankind.' In this striking epigram, a nineteenth-century writer links science with its background. Like most epigrams, its power lies in emphasizing by contrast an aspect of truth which may be easily overlooked. In this case, it is easy to overlook the relations between science and mankind, and to treat the former as some abstract third party, which can somefimes be praised for its beneficial influences, but international conflict. Is this the inevitable result of the progress of science or does the fault lie elsewhere?
Which of the following is/ are emphatically conveyed by the author of the passage?
1. Without science, mankind could not have continued to exist till today.
2, It is the science that will ultimately determine the destiny of mankind.
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
- Statement 1: Without science, mankind could not have continued to exist till today.
- The passage doesn’t claim that science is the sole reason for humanity's existence. It highlights the historical link between science and mankind but doesn’t state their survival is solely dependent on science.
- Statement 2: It is the science that will ultimately determine the destiny of mankind.
- The passage explores the influence of science but doesn’t make a definitive claim that science alone will decide humanity's future.
- Option 1: 1 only
- Incorrect, as the passage doesn’t exclusively highlight science as the pivotal reason for mankind’s continued existence.
- Option 2: 2 only
- Incorrect, as the destiny of mankind isn’t stated to be solely dependent on science in the passage.
- Option 3: Both 1 and 2
- Incorrect, as neither statement is strongly supported by the text.
- Option 4: Neither 1 nor 2
- Correct, as neither statement is emphatically conveyed by the author in the passage.
.
Report error
Access to prime resources