Sun	Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat
23	24	25	26	27	28	1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30	31	1	2	3	4	5

Back to Main Page

Multiple Choice Questions

The given sentence has been broken up into four different parts The error if any will be in one or m...........

English Language Ph-1&2 (RBI) Error correction

The given sentence has been broken up into four different parts. The error, if any, will be in one or more parts of the sentence. Select the option which contains the combination of the error. If all are correct mark Option 5 as your answer.

Ratan Tata’s advocate told the Bombay High Court (A)/ that Nusli Wadia filled a criminal defamation case (B)/ for him because of a fallout of a corporate dispute as (C)/ Mr. Wadia was a strong supporter on the former Tata Sons chairman Cyrus Mistry. (D)/ All are correct (E)

This questions was previously asked in

RBI Grade B (9 November 2019)

View All RBIB Previous Year Papers

BCD

ABC

ACD

DCA

All are correct

छोटे Courses बड़े Results

Master Error correction

Prepare through Micro-courses

Try Now

Explanation:

- A: "Ratan Tata’s advocate told the Bombay High Court" - This part is correct. It's clear and grammatically accurate.

- B: "that Nusli Wadia filled a criminal defamation case" - The error here is "filled." It should be "filed."

- C: "for him because of a fallout of a corporate dispute as" - The phrase "because of a fallout of" is awkward. It could be better phrased as "due to the fallout from."

- D: "Mr. Wadia was a strong supporter on the former Tata Sons chairman Cyrus Mistry." - The error is in "supporter on." It should be "supporter of."

- Correct Answer: Option 1 - BCD. It correctly identifies the errors.

Report error

Submit Error