send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Directions : Which of the phrase/ word from the options (a), (b), (c) and (d) given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold letters to make the sentence grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark (e) i.e., “No replacement required” as the answer.
The politicians makes vague promise about tax cuts.
has promises
would recalled policies
made vague promises
should conflict promise
No replacement required
- The original phrase "makes vague promise" is grammatically incorrect because "makes" is a present tense verb and should be "make" to match with the plural noun "politicians". Additionally, "promise" should be plural as "promises."
- Option 1: has promises - This suggests possession rather than an action and doesn't fit the context.
- Option 2: would recalled policies - This is incorrect grammatically and contextually, as "recalled" does not fit with promises about tax cuts.
- Option 3: made vague promises - Corrects the tense and number agreement. "Made" aligns with the past tense and "promises" is plural to match the subject "politicians."
- Option 4: should conflict promise - This does not make sense contextually, as it introduces "conflict," which is not related to the original meaning.
- Option 5: No replacement required - Suggests the sentence is already correct, which it is not.
Report error
Access to prime resources