send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Directions: The question given below consists of a passage, followed by three arguments I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' arguments and which of the arguments are 'weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.
Passage: Ministry of Railways has invited bids for operating of passenger train services over 109 routes, using 151 modern trains on the existing rail infrastructure. It is the first step ever in the direction of private investment for running passenger trains over the Indian Railways network. An estimated ?30,000 crore investment is expected, beginning from 2023. Is this a good step from the Indian Railways?
Arguments:
I. Yes. An Expert Committee under the Chairmanship of Bibek Debroy had recommended the step in 2015.
II. Yes.This will improve the quality of services offered by Railways due to a higher focus on customer satisfaction.
III. No. Losses of Private players in Passenger services will have to be cross-subsidized from freight carriage profits of Indian Railways.
Only I and II are strong
Only II and III are strong
Only I is strong
Only II is strong
All the arguments are strong
Report error
Access to prime resources