send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which one of the following nature of work shall not be taken into account while the Appropriate Government considers prohibiting employment of contract labour in an establishment under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 ?
The process, operation or other work is incidental to or necessary for the industry
The work is of a permanent nature
The work is done ordinarily through regular workmen
The work is of intermittent nature
- Option 1: The process, operation, or other work is incidental to or necessary for the industry
- This means the work is crucial to the industry's functioning. Such roles are usually considered for regularization, not for contract labour prohibition.
- Option 2: The work is of a permanent nature
- Permanent nature implies stability and continuity, which can justify regular employment rather than contract labour.
- Option 3: The work is done ordinarily through regular workmen
- If it’s normally done by regular employees, this reflects the work’s regular and essential nature, unsuitable for contract labour.
- Option 4: The work is of intermittent nature
- If work is occasional or irregular, it's typically suitable for contract labour, hence not considered for prohibition.
. The correct answer is not Option 4. It is instead necessary to consider if the work is of a permanent nature or if it is ordinarily done by regular workmen, which suggests Options 2 or 3 would lean towards prohibiting contract labour.
Report error
Access to prime resources