send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In the case of Mohammad Salimullah vs ________, the Supreme Court observed in 2021 that the 'Right not to be deported' is
concomitant to Article 19 and available only to Indian citizens?
State of Maharashtra
Union of India
State of Tripura
Union Territory of Lakshadweep
- The case of Mohammad Salimullah vs ________ in 2021 centered on the rights of refugees and deportation concerns.
- The Supreme Court observed that the 'Right not to be deported' is linked to Article 19, which guarantees certain freedoms, but is available only to Indian citizens.
- Option 1: State of Maharashtra - This does not fit the context of the national-level legal issue about deportation and rights which would involve the central government.
- Option 2: Union of India - This is the central government of India and is the correct answer because cases involving deportation and constitutional rights typically involve the Union of India.
- Option 3: State of Tripura - Similar to Maharashtra, this state-level body would not be a direct party in a nationwide constitutional issue about deportation.
- Option 4: Union Territory of Lakshadweep - Like the states, union territories are less likely to be involved in national judicial matters of this nature.
Report error
Access to prime resources