send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In the case of Vikas KishanRao Gawali vs _________, in January 2021, the Supreme Court observed that OBC reservation cannot
exceed 50%.
State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Maharashtra
State of Goa
State of Telangana
- Supreme Court Observation: In January 2021, the Supreme Court emphasized that reservations for Other Backward Classes (OBC) cannot surpass 50% of the total seats.
- Option: 1 - State of Madhya Pradesh: This state was not directly involved in the particular case regarding the 50% cap observation around this period.
- Option: 2 - State of Maharashtra: This option is correct. The case specifically involved Maharashtra, where the court made the observation concerning the reservation limit.
- Option: 3 - State of Goa: Similar to Madhya Pradesh, Goa was not a party in this particular case related to the reservation cap at that time.
- Option: 4 - State of Telangana: Telangana also wasn't directly relevant to the Supreme Court's decision surrounding the 50% cap in January 2021.
Report error
Access to prime resources