India has officially opposed a global ban on chlorpyrifos, a pesticide commonly used in agriculture and public health, during the recent meetings of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) held in Geneva. The chemical was proposed to be listed under Annex A, which would mandate its complete global elimination.
During the Basel, Rotterdam, and Stockholm (BRS) Conventions, India requested exemptions or delay in inclusion under Annex A however, Groups like Pesticide Action Network (PAN) India are advocating for an unconditional global ban, warning of long-term ecological and health damage.
Why the Ban?
- Health Concerns: Chlorpyrifos has been linked to neurodevelopmental disorders, lower birth weights, and increased risk of cancer (particularly lung and prostate cancers).
- Environmental Impact: It is considered a persistent organic pollutant, meaning it remains in the environment for long periods, accumulating in ecosystems and the food chain.
- International Response: Over 40 countries, including the US and members of the EU, have already banned or heavily restricted chlorpyrifos due to its proven toxicity.
- WHO Classification: The World Health Organization classifies it as a moderately hazardous pesticide.
Why India Opposes the Ban?
- Agricultural Dependence: Chlorpyrifos has been used in India since 1977 and is critical for controlling pests in crops such as rice, cotton, and pulses.
- Lack of Alternatives: India argues that there are currently no affordable or equally effective substitutes available, especially for small-scale farmers.
- Food Security Concerns: Officials fear that an abrupt ban could impact crop yields and food availability, disrupting rural livelihoods and public health pest control (e.g., for mosquitoes).
- Urban Use: Apart from agriculture, it is also used in urban pest management against mosquitoes and termites.
India’s stand reflects a broader global challenge—balancing agricultural productivity and economic stability with long-term environmental and health sustainability. Further negotiations are expected to determine the final outcome of the proposed listing.