send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Your free trial has ended. Purchase this micro course to continue learning.
8 of 24 completed
5 of 15 completed
38 of 100 completed
8 of 20 completed
Indian Economy - Understanding the basics of Indian economic system
Context: Recently a complaint alleging sexual harassment has been filed in Kolkata against West Bengal Governor. Despite this, Constitutional immunity prevents the police from identifying the Governor as a suspect or conducting an investigation into the matter.
Constitutional Immunity: Under Article 361, the Constitution establishes a total prohibition on prosecuting the Governor.
The police can take action only after the Governor ceases to be in office, which is when either the Governor resigns or he no longer enjoys the confidence of the President.
Article 361 of the Constitution: It states that the President and the Governors shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office or for any act done by him in the exercise and performance of those powers and duties.
No criminal proceedings shall be initiated or continued against the President, or the Governor of a State, in any court during the term of his office.
No process for the arrest or imprisonment of the President, or the Governor of a State, shall be issued from any court during his term of office.
Rameshwar Prasad v Union of India, 2006: In this case, the Supreme Court outlined the immunity enjoyed by the Governor even on allegations of personal malafides.
He is not answerable to any Court for the exercise and performance of his official duties.
The ruling is not for criminal complaints but for exercising discretionary constitutional powers.
Demolition of the Babri Masjid Case: In 2017, the Supreme Court allowed fresh charges of criminal conspiracy against UP Chief Minister Kalyan Singh in the 1992 demolition of the Babri Masjid.
However, the trial did not take place since he was then the Governor of Rajasthan.
Ruling by Court: The court held that, being the Governor of Rajasthan, he is entitled to immunity under Article 361 of the Constitution as long as he remains Governor of Rajasthan.
The Court of Sessions will frame charges and move against him as soon as he ceases to be Governor.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses