send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Your free trial has ended. Purchase this micro course to continue learning.
8 of 24 completed
5 of 15 completed
38 of 100 completed
8 of 20 completed
Indian Economy - Understanding the basics of Indian economic system
Context: Karnataka Cabinet has recommended that the Centre amend the Constitution by inserting Article 341 (3). This proposed amendment would empower states to implement internal reservation policies among Scheduled Castes (SCs).
The genesis of this recommendation traces back to the State Assembly election in 2023 when the Ruling party pledged to present the J. Sadashiva Commission report on internal reservation.
This report, submitted in 2012, had been closed by the then government during its final days in power, which instead proposed internal reservation under four distinct categories.
The report recommended a classification of 15% SC quota with 6% to SC (left), 5% to right, 3% to Bhovi, Lambani, Koracha and Korama castes, and 1% to others. However, the previous Bommai government increased the SC quota to 17% through an Ordinance, following the recommendations of Justice Nagamohan Das Commission.
The then government's decision to close the commission report and endorse internal reservation under specific categories, including SC (Left), SC (Right), touchables (Banjara, Bhovi, Korcha, Korma, and others), and others, prompted the new government to seek a constitutional amendment.
Social Welfare Minister emphasized the necessity of Article 341 (3) for states to make adjustments to the reservation matrix, citing the supremacy of Parliament.
The minister referred to a Madras High Court order stating that there can be "no quota within a quota" and highlighted a legal battle in Punjab, where a seven-judge Bench is deliberating on a similar issue.
The decision aligns with the understanding that states cannot act independently without a constitutional amendment.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses