In the case of Mohammad Salimullah vs ________, the Supreme Court observed in 2021 that the 'Right not to be deported' is
concomitant to Article 19 and available only to Indian citizens?
This questions was previously asked in
SSC CHSL 25th May 2022 Shift-2
State of Maharashtra
Incorrect AnswerUnion of India
Correct AnswerState of Tripura
Incorrect AnswerUnion Territory of Lakshadweep
Incorrect AnswerExplanation:
- The case of Mohammad Salimullah vs ________ in 2021 centered on the rights of refugees and deportation concerns.
- The Supreme Court observed that the 'Right not to be deported' is linked to Article 19, which guarantees certain freedoms, but is available only to Indian citizens.
- Option 1: State of Maharashtra - This does not fit the context of the national-level legal issue about deportation and rights which would involve the central government.
- Option 2: Union of India - This is the central government of India and is the correct answer because cases involving deportation and constitutional rights typically involve the Union of India.
- Option 3: State of Tripura - Similar to Maharashtra, this state-level body would not be a direct party in a nationwide constitutional issue about deportation.
- Option 4: Union Territory of Lakshadweep - Like the states, union territories are less likely to be involved in national judicial matters of this nature.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error