Context: Recently, at a meeting of the Indian Banks’ Association, the idea of floating an asset reconstruction company (ARC) to improve the recovery from bad loans in the agricultural sector was discussed.

Need for such mechanism

• As per the RBI’s Financial Stability Report, bad loans for the agricultural sector stood at 9.8% at the end of March 2021.
• In comparison, they were at 11.3% and 7.5% for the industry and services sectors, respectively.
• Issues Raised by Farm Loan Waivers: The announcement of farm loan waivers by states around elections leads to “deteriorating credit culture”.
• Current Mechanism to tackle NPAs of Agri-Sector: At present, there is neither a unified mechanism to tackle NPAs in the farm sector nor a single law that deals with enforcement of mortgages created on agricultural land.

Creating ARCs for Farm Sector
Recent Proposal: To improve recovery of bad loans in the agriculture sector, leading banks have made a pitch for setting up an ARC specifically to deal with collections and recovery of farm loans.

• With a government-backed ARC having been recently set up to deal with bank NPAs to the industry, this idea has acceptability among banks.

Arguments in Favour of ARCs for Farm Loans: As agricultural markets are dispersed, a single institution, as opposed to multiple banks, would be more suited to deal with collections and recoveries from farm loans, optimising the costs of the recovery.

• Considering the absence of a unified framework to deal with the enforcement of mortgages created on agricultural land, there is a case for creating an effective mechanism for the recovery of dues.

Arguments Against Creating ARCs for Farm Loans

• First and foremost, the requirement of the ARC is to have sufficient availability of funds to match the huge amount of the NPA market.
• Even if sufficient funds are available with ARC, the price expectation mismatch between selling bank (s) and buying ARC and agreement on an acceptable valuation of the bad assets will also create a challenge for ARC.
• As local banks have far greater presence on the ground than a single ARC, they are likely to be more capable of navigating the local terrain to recover their dues.
• Local bank officials may be more successful in dealing with hundreds and thousands of these small borrowers than a single ARC.
• As rural land markets are characterised by lack of clear titles and multiple stakeholders, ARCs specifically the farm sector is not an as prudent approach.
• Moreover, even though land is a mortgageable asset, it is an emotive, political issue.
• There is also a possibility that since agriculture is a state subject, such an approach could risk being seen as encroaching on the rights of states.

Key Suggestion

• Observing the Success Rates of Other ARCs: The government has already set up such a framework (of ARCs) for the resolution of corporate sector loans that have turned bad.
• Considering that doubts have been expressed over the effectiveness of the architecture of ARCs, a more prudent approach would be to assess its experience and then chalk the way forward.
• Moreover, if there is indeed a need to provide for a similar framework for agricultural loans, then the same architecture could be employed.

Alternatives to Help Farmers: There are also other ways to help farmers such as ensuring timely access to credit on more favourable terms.

• A broader policy framework should be available to facilitate farming to become a more remunerative occupation.

Easing the NPA Sale Procedure: It is utmost necessary for a rigorous and a realistic approach to pricing between the banks and ARCs.

Road Ahead

• There are better ways to help farmers  firstly by  ensuring timely access to credit on more favourable terms for farmers and secondly by the broader policy framework should facilitate farming becomes a more remunerative occupation.Therefore, it is an urgent need for all stakeholders, including the regulator, to come together to make the entire process of NPA sale, resolution, recovery and revival fast and smooth.