In case of A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 was found conflicting with the two Articles:
Articles 14 and 17
Incorrect AnswerArticles 19 and 21
Correct AnswerArticles 23 and 25
Incorrect AnswerArticles 23 and 32.
Incorrect AnswerExplanation:
- Option 1: Articles 14 and 17
- Article 14 ensures equality before the law.
- Article 17 abolishes untouchability.
- Not primarily involved in the A.K. Gopalan case.
- Option 2: Articles 19 and 21
- Article 19 protects certain freedoms, such as speech and expression.
- Article 21 ensures protection of life and personal liberty.
- This is related to the case, as it deals with personal liberty under preventive detention.
- Correct Answer
- Option 3: Articles 23 and 25
- Article 23 prohibits human trafficking and forced labor.
- Article 25 assures freedom of religion.
- Not relevant to the A.K. Gopalan case.
- Option 4: Articles 23 and 32
- Article 23 prohibits human trafficking and forced labor.
- Article 32 provides remedies for enforcement of fundamental rights.
- Not relevant to the case's primary issue.
![]()
By: santosh