send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
“It is not that legal theory is irrelevant to legal practice but that the legal theory and the legal practice of corporate personality have developed independently of each other. The task of legal theory is to explore the ultimate foundations of legal systems and institutions and to pursue them into the manifold practical and specific situations and problems that arise. In a totalitarian system the concession theory obviously has much greater force than in a liberal system, which allows freedom of association. The organic character or the state is largely dependent of the function which it exercises in society just as the medical guild and the limited company are not social or legal phenomena of the same orders”.
This statement is made by:
Hegel
Salmond
Friedman
Bryce.
- The given statement discusses the independent evolution of legal theory and legal practice regarding corporate personality.
- It says legal theory should explore legal systems' foundations and apply them to practical problems.
- It mentions concession theory is stronger in totalitarian systems, while liberal systems emphasize freedom of association.
- The statement compares entities like states, medical guilds, and companies, saying they differ in their social/legal nature.
- Hegel (Option 1): German philosopher, framed the state as an organic whole but is not commonly linked to concession theory.
- Salmond (Option 2): Legal theorist, known for jurisprudence, but not specifically noted for such statements about corporate personality.
- Friedman (Option 3): Well-known for discussing corporate personality and legal theory distinctions; this is his style and area.
- Bryce (Option 4): Wrote about constitutions and law, but not especially connected to these aspects of corporate personality.
- Correct Answer: Option 3 - Friedman
- This is a classic analysis from Friedman’s works on legal theory and corporate personality.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses