send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
“I recognize without hesitation that judges do must legislate, but they can do so only interestlessly; they are confined from molar to molecules”
The above observation of Justice Homes were given with approval (by the Supreme Court of India) in
Rajeshwar Prasad Vs. The State of West Bengal case.
Kesavanand BharatiVs. Stte of Kerala case.
Golaknath Vs. State of Punjab case.
Sajjan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan case.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses