send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Custom is a source of law and it itself is not law. The supporters of this view belong to
Analytical School
Historical School
Sociological School
None of the above
Correct option 1: Analytical School
The Analytical School of jurisprudence, led by thinkers like John Austin, holds that custom is not law until it is recognized and enforced by the sovereign authority. According to this view, customs are merely sources from which laws may originate, but they do not have the status of law unless they are codified or sanctioned by the state.
In contrast:
The Historical School (e.g., Savigny) views custom as law in itself, evolving naturally over time.
The Sociological School focuses on law's social purposes.
The Realist School emphasizes what judges actually do, not what laws say.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses