send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
G filed complaint against P, then he moved session in revision, got himself examined as witness, imploded in criminal revision before High Court. G knew the charge to be false
It can be inferred that G was prosecutor
It cannot be inferred as G traced his right in question
Facts reveal that he was not prosecutor
All of the above
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses