send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
If the goods have been bailed to the master and the master did not entrust the same to the servant. But servant commits theft-the master
Is liable for the act
Is not liable as the act was cut side the course of employment
Is liable as master could not keep proper care of goods bailed
Is liable as the master’s liability is not put to an end by the master
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses