send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Morris Vs. CW Martin and Sons Ltd. Dependants were the bailee of a fur coat given to them for cleaning. They gave this coat to their servant Morrisey for cleaning. Morrisey stole the coat-
Dependents could be made liable for the act was done in course of employment
Dependant could not be made liable for the act was done in course of employment
Dependant could not be made liable for the act was out of bounds of the master
Dependant never permitted the commission of theft hence not liable
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses