send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
PRINCIPLE: Vicarious liability is the liability of the Master or Principal for the tort committed by his servant or agent, provided the tort is committed in the course of employment. The Master or Principal is not liable for private wrongs of the servant /agent.
FACTS: X hands over some cash money at his house to Y, who is X’s neighbour and is also cashier in a bank, to be deposited in A’s account in the bank. Instead of depositing the money, Y misappropriates it.
Which of the following statements depict correct legal position in this given legal situation?
The bank would not be liable because Y did not do any wrong in the course of his employment.
The bank would be vicariously liable because Y was the employee of the bank.
The bank would not be liable because Y did not do any wrong.
The bank would be liable because Y acted as bank’s agent.
Y was handed over the cash in his capacity as X’s neighbour. So, it’s in the nature of a personal arrangement between the two, and the Bank will not be liable for wrongs arising out of that.
By: kartikey ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses